Affordability has always been a concern for consumers and producers. A recent look at some important data suggests that affordability has become a major concern for providers of water and sewer utility services in the US. For the first time since the 1950's, personal income in the United States has experienced negative annual growth: personal income has actually fallen in real terms for the first time in almost 60 years. This is no surprise to those who read the daily news and understand the recession's deepening hold on the US economy, but utility providers should pay special attention because, while water and sewer rate increases were never popular, they are even less so when family income is declining.
This decrease in personal income coincides with the water and sewer industries' growing need for capital investment. Aging infrastructure for water and sewer systems causes major service disruptions and damage to residences, businesses, and even to local waterways. Stepwise Advisors reports that the US Conference of Mayors said that community leaders expect that capital spending on water and sewer infrastructure could possibly quadruple from current levels.
The EPA suggests that a utility bill is "unaffordable" if it exceeds 2.5% median household income. Income is unevenly distributed in the economy, though, and one thing that often goes overlooked in rate setting is the difference in water usage between newer, presumably more affluent homes, and older neighborhoods with presumably lower incomes.
The argument is often made that affluence equates to higher water usage, and this has been one rationale used to argue for increasing unit prices for increased usage levels (i.e. inclining block rates). However, that argument is many times based on a false premise. In Milwaukee, for example, research found that water usage was highest in older neighborhoods and found an inverse correlation between household income and water usage, the lowest incomes had the highest usage (Milwaukee Wisconsin Journal Sentinel, July 17, 2010).
Relatively higher usage in older neighborhoods is likely in every community because newer homes are constructed with newer building codes that require more stringent, water-saving plumbing requirements; older homes were not subject to those codes and have older fixtures that tend to use more water (including more sewage thanks to older toilets and sinks).
Pitting demand for low customer water rates against requirements for increased spending on infrastructure projects will intensify conflicts between consumer and provider. As it also appears that consumers in older neighborhoods may be using more water than originally thought, the affordability issue will emerge as an additional point of frustration for consumers facing tight family budgets. More affluent customers may consume lower volumes than the less-well off and enjoy lower water utility bills than would consumers in older areas.
This decrease in personal income coincides with the water and sewer industries' growing need for capital investment. Aging infrastructure for water and sewer systems causes major service disruptions and damage to residences, businesses, and even to local waterways. Stepwise Advisors reports that the US Conference of Mayors said that community leaders expect that capital spending on water and sewer infrastructure could possibly quadruple from current levels.
The EPA suggests that a utility bill is "unaffordable" if it exceeds 2.5% median household income. Income is unevenly distributed in the economy, though, and one thing that often goes overlooked in rate setting is the difference in water usage between newer, presumably more affluent homes, and older neighborhoods with presumably lower incomes.
The argument is often made that affluence equates to higher water usage, and this has been one rationale used to argue for increasing unit prices for increased usage levels (i.e. inclining block rates). However, that argument is many times based on a false premise. In Milwaukee, for example, research found that water usage was highest in older neighborhoods and found an inverse correlation between household income and water usage, the lowest incomes had the highest usage (Milwaukee Wisconsin Journal Sentinel, July 17, 2010).
Relatively higher usage in older neighborhoods is likely in every community because newer homes are constructed with newer building codes that require more stringent, water-saving plumbing requirements; older homes were not subject to those codes and have older fixtures that tend to use more water (including more sewage thanks to older toilets and sinks).
Pitting demand for low customer water rates against requirements for increased spending on infrastructure projects will intensify conflicts between consumer and provider. As it also appears that consumers in older neighborhoods may be using more water than originally thought, the affordability issue will emerge as an additional point of frustration for consumers facing tight family budgets. More affluent customers may consume lower volumes than the less-well off and enjoy lower water utility bills than would consumers in older areas.
About the Author:
Author Jason Mumm is a widely respected among Utility Consultants and Water Rates Consultants. With many years of experience helping service providers manage infrastructure costs and consumer rates, Jason provides services through his organization - StepWise Advisors. Unique version for reprint here: Utilities Concerned For Affordability.